A: I was thinking about this on the plane to New Zealand. I'd like to be hired to shoot someone for a magazine photo spread. No assistants, no lighting, just me, the subject and a couple of cameras. I love the William Claxton/Barry Feinstein black and white thing. I think photography has gotten to such an equalized place in terms of image quality that it's really all about who you got doing what, not that you got a well exposed and composed image of it. (Although it helps.)
His answer is so refreshing and challenging for me.
Refreshing because: At the end of the day (a phrase I loathe), it's all about what that photographer is gonna bring to the table. Though, I'm not 100% with him when it comes to proper exposure and composition, I get what he's saying. I do believe a photographer should understand the inter-workings of a camera and how to use it to their advantage.
Challenging because: I should be pushing myself with my equipment resources no matter how expensive or inexpensive they may be. Be content. Create no matter what. This can pose a challenge because of the constant push for faster glass, the bigger, better camera. Getting back to basics is a creative goal. I'm not there, but will continue to strive for it.
Kent asked me yesterday if I could photograph anyone in the world who would it be. I got "John Ma" out of my mouth, and he said, "Besides John Mayer". I'd always imagined asking him if I could take his picture before asking for an autograph or anything. But, in terms of just a subject and just me with my camera, I came up with a 2nd answer. I would've loved the opportunity to photograph both of my grandfathers.
0 comments:
Post a Comment